Natalie Picton

2025-26 season

Real season production first, then how it splits against tougher/weaker opponents and how it's trended over time. Want to see what she'd project to at a different school? Use the button below to send her straight into Transfer Projection.

Project this player to a school
Natalie Picton
JR · G · 5' 5" · Sacramento State
64.4
Summit Score

Per-Game Production

31
GP
31
GS
35.8
MPG
13.4
PPG
3.7
RPG
2.1
APG
2.2
SPG
0.1
BPG
2.8
TOPG
48.4
TS%
37.0
FG%
31.4
3FG%
82.5
FT%
64.4
Summit Score

Top 41.96% nationally by Summit Score, among 2025-26 Division I players on record.

Season by season 1 transfer on record

Trend: Improving (+6.2 Summit Score/season) · Heuristic based on average Hoop Score change per season on record (>= +3.0 Improving, <= -3.0 Declining, else Stable) -- not a fitted statistical trend.

2023-24: 51.9 Summit Score (Montana State)51.92023-242024-25: 81.7 Summit Score (Montana State)81.72024-252025-26: 64.4 Summit Score (Sacramento State)64.42025-26
SeasonTeamGPMPGPPGRPGAPGTS%Summit Score
2023-24Montana State3329.07.32.22.142.451.9
2024-25Montana State3416.06.31.81.557.281.7
2025-26Sacramento Statetransferred in3135.813.43.72.148.464.4

Key Stats?

Not a percentile and not a comparison against the rest of the league -- each axis is capped at a fixed, realistic ceiling for a women's college season (e.g. 28 PPG, 14 RPG, 70% TS), purely so the shape stays readable at a glance. The real number is always printed at every point.

PPG: 13.4PPG13.4RPG: 3.7RPG3.7APG: 2.1APG2.1SPG: 2.2SPG2.2BPG: 0.1BPG0.1TOPG: 2.8TOPG2.8TS%: 48.4TS%48.4

Performance by Opponent Strength?

2025-26 season, 31 games logged.

SplitGPPPGRPGAPGSPGBPGTOPGMPGFG%
vs. High-Major (HM)19.03.01.02.00.03.034.030.8%
vs. Mid-Major (MM)47.53.22.22.50.55.037.823.4%
vs. Low-Major (LM)2413.83.82.02.00.02.636.836.9%
vs. Top 50 nationally19.03.01.02.00.03.034.030.8%
Last 10 games1015.64.22.21.10.12.637.940.4%

Games against any of the 50 highest-rated teams in the country this season (by current_rating), regardless of tier -- not a top-50-per-tier cut.

Best 3 Games

Ranked by points + rebounds + assists combined, 2025-26 season -- real box scores, no projection involved.

DateOpponentMinPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOFG3PTFT
Dec 16Simpson (CA) Red Hawks2227463009-135-74-4
Feb 27MontanaLM3924752008-146-112-2
Feb 3Weber State WildcatsLM3822532049-173-61-2

Game-by-Game Production Rating?

2025-26 season, one bar per game -- points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks added up, turnovers subtracted, so a quiet scoring night that was still a big all-around game (or a big scoring night undone by turnovers) still shows up as a strong or weak game here. Bars that dip below the line are games with a negative production rating (more turnovers than total production).

Nov 4 vs Stanton Elks: 27 production rating (18 pts, 3 reb, 3 ast, 5 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Nov 6 vs Nevada: 16 production rating (13 pts, 2 reb, 3 ast, 4 stl, 0 blk, 6 TO)Nov 10 vs California: 12 production rating (9 pts, 3 reb, 1 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)Nov 13 vs UC San Diego Tritons: 19 production rating (13 pts, 3 reb, 1 ast, 3 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Nov 15 vs Long Beach State: 16 production rating (12 pts, 4 reb, 3 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 5 TO)Nov 22 vs Cal State Fullerton: 20 production rating (11 pts, 4 reb, 5 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Nov 25 vs UC Davis Aggies: 28 production rating (24 pts, 5 reb, 1 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)Nov 28 vs Chattanooga: 13 production rating (11 pts, 1 reb, 2 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)Nov 29 vs California Baptist: 5 production rating (5 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)Dec 5 vs Pacific: 6 production rating (4 pts, 3 reb, 1 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Dec 16 vs Simpson (CA) Red Hawks: 40 production rating (27 pts, 4 reb, 6 ast, 3 stl, 0 blk, 0 TO)Dec 18 vs San Francisco Dons: 8 production rating (3 pts, 4 reb, 2 ast, 1 stl, 2 blk, 4 TO)Dec 21 vs San José State Spartans: 14 production rating (10 pts, 4 reb, 3 ast, 5 stl, 0 blk, 8 TO)Jan 2 vs Idaho State: 14 production rating (6 pts, 3 reb, 1 ast, 5 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Jan 3 vs Weber State Wildcats: 14 production rating (12 pts, 3 reb, 0 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)Jan 10 vs Portland State: 29 production rating (21 pts, 5 reb, 3 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Jan 16 vs Northern Arizona: 24 production rating (14 pts, 5 reb, 3 ast, 4 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Jan 17 vs Northern Colorado: 18 production rating (7 pts, 7 reb, 2 ast, 3 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Jan 23 vs Idaho: 22 production rating (18 pts, 4 reb, 3 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 5 TO)Jan 24 vs Eastern Washington: 24 production rating (18 pts, 3 reb, 1 ast, 3 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Jan 30 vs Montana State: 3 production rating (2 pts, 2 reb, 0 ast, 3 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)Jan 31 vs Montana: 26 production rating (17 pts, 8 reb, 2 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Feb 3 vs Weber State Wildcats: 28 production rating (22 pts, 5 reb, 3 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)Feb 7 vs Portland State: 21 production rating (17 pts, 4 reb, 2 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)Feb 13 vs Northern Colorado: 15 production rating (12 pts, 4 reb, 2 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)Feb 21 vs Idaho: 9 production rating (6 pts, 2 reb, 1 ast, 1 stl, 1 blk, 2 TO)Feb 27 vs Montana: 38 production rating (24 pts, 7 reb, 5 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 0 TO)Feb 28 vs Montana State: 13 production rating (6 pts, 4 reb, 3 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Mar 3 vs Idaho State: 21 production rating (18 pts, 5 reb, 1 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 5 TO)Mar 9 vs Idaho State: 22 production rating (19 pts, 1 reb, 3 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Mar 10 vs Idaho: 13 production rating (15 pts, 2 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)