Daeja Holmes
2025-26 season
Real season production first, then how it splits against tougher/weaker opponents and how it's trended over time. Want to see what she'd project to at a different school? Use the button below to send her straight into Transfer Projection.
Per-Game Production
Top 41.55% nationally by Summit Score, among 2025-26 Division I players on record.
Season by season
Trend: Improving (+5.7 Summit Score/season) · Heuristic based on average Hoop Score change per season on record (>= +3.0 Improving, <= -3.0 Declining, else Stable) -- not a fitted statistical trend.
| Season | Team | GP | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TS% | Summit Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Texas Southern | 27 | 28.2 | 9.7 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 43.3 | 53.2 | ||
| 2024-25 | Texas Southern | 28 | 23.1 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 39.2 | 52.4 | ||
| 2025-26 | Texas Southern | 25 | 27.5 | 12.0 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 52.2 | 64.6 | ||
Key Stats?
Not a percentile and not a comparison against the rest of the league -- each axis is capped at a fixed, realistic ceiling for a women's college season (e.g. 28 PPG, 14 RPG, 70% TS), purely so the shape stays readable at a glance. The real number is always printed at every point.
Performance by Opponent Strength?
2025-26 season, 25 games logged.
| Split | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TOPG | MPG | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs. High-Major (HM) | 3 | 10.3 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 5.0 | 33.3 | 40.6% |
| vs. Mid-Major (MM) | 2 | 11.0 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 32.5 | 33.3% |
| vs. Low-Major (LM) | 16 | 12.8 | 4.3 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 27.8 | 43.7% |
| vs. Top 50 nationally | 3 | 10.3 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 5.0 | 33.3 | 40.6% |
| Last 10 games | 10 | 12.7 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 24.4 | 46.9% |
Games against any of the 50 highest-rated teams in the country this season (by current_rating), regardless of tier -- not a top-50-per-tier cut.
Best 3 Games
Ranked by points + rebounds + assists combined, 2025-26 season -- real box scores, no projection involved.
| Date | Opponent | Min | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3PT | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31 | Prairie View A&MLM | 36 | 34 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12-17 | 5-7 | 5-8 |
| Dec 15 | East Texas A&MLM | 36 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-18 | 2-7 | 2-2 |
| Jan 2 | GramblingLM | 39 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5-15 | 3-8 | 5-6 |
Game-by-Game Production Rating?
2025-26 season, one bar per game -- points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks added up, turnovers subtracted, so a quiet scoring night that was still a big all-around game (or a big scoring night undone by turnovers) still shows up as a strong or weak game here. Bars that dip below the line are games with a negative production rating (more turnovers than total production).