Rose Caso
2025-26 season
Real season production first, then how it splits against tougher/weaker opponents and how it's trended over time. Want to see what she'd project to at a different school? Use the button below to send her straight into Transfer Projection.
Per-Game Production
Top 38.8% nationally by Summit Score, among 2025-26 Division I players on record.
Season by season 1 transfer on record
Trend: Improving (+7.1 Summit Score/season) · Heuristic based on average Hoop Score change per season on record (>= +3.0 Improving, <= -3.0 Declining, else Stable) -- not a fitted statistical trend.
| Season | Team | GP | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TS% | Summit Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Merrimack | 27 | 15.6 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 46.9 | 52.2 | ||
| 2024-25 | Merrimack | 31 | 25.5 | 7.9 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 53.0 | 57.7 | ||
| 2025-26 | Stetsontransferred in | 32 | 25.3 | 7.9 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 49.8 | 66.4 | ||
Key Stats?
Not a percentile and not a comparison against the rest of the league -- each axis is capped at a fixed, realistic ceiling for a women's college season (e.g. 28 PPG, 14 RPG, 70% TS), purely so the shape stays readable at a glance. The real number is always printed at every point.
Performance by Opponent Strength?
2025-26 season, 32 games logged.
| Split | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TOPG | MPG | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs. High-Major (HM) | 3 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 25.0 | 21.1% |
| vs. Mid-Major (MM) | 6 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 27.3 | 28.1% |
| vs. Low-Major (LM) | 21 | 8.8 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 25.7 | 45.4% |
| vs. Top 50 nationally | 2 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 22.5 | 20.0% |
| Last 10 games | 10 | 8.3 | 5.4 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 27.3 | 47.3% |
Games against any of the 50 highest-rated teams in the country this season (by current_rating), regardless of tier -- not a top-50-per-tier cut.
Best 3 Games
Ranked by points + rebounds + assists combined, 2025-26 season -- real box scores, no projection involved.
| Date | Opponent | Min | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3PT | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3 | North AlabamaLM | 30 | 19 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9-18 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| Mar 20 | Florida InternationalLM | 42 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 8-13 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| Nov 25 | Northern KentuckyLM | 27 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5-14 | 1-4 | 5-5 |
Game-by-Game Production Rating?
2025-26 season, one bar per game -- points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks added up, turnovers subtracted, so a quiet scoring night that was still a big all-around game (or a big scoring night undone by turnovers) still shows up as a strong or weak game here. Bars that dip below the line are games with a negative production rating (more turnovers than total production).