Claire Henson
2025-26 season
Real season production first, then how it splits against tougher/weaker opponents and how it's trended over time. Want to see what she'd project to at a different school? Use the button below to send her straight into Transfer Projection.
Per-Game Production
Top 43.04% nationally by Summit Score, among 2025-26 Division I players on record.
Season by season
Trend: Improving (+5.8 Summit Score/season) · Heuristic based on average Hoop Score change per season on record (>= +3.0 Improving, <= -3.0 Declining, else Stable) -- not a fitted statistical trend.
| Season | Team | GP | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TS% | Summit Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Wright State | 21 | 12.2 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 47.2 | 52.3 | ||
| 2024-25 | Wright State | 32 | 27.7 | 9.8 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 43.1 | 60.9 | ||
| 2025-26 | Wright State | 32 | 28.3 | 10.3 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 46.4 | 63.9 | ||
Key Stats?
Not a percentile and not a comparison against the rest of the league -- each axis is capped at a fixed, realistic ceiling for a women's college season (e.g. 28 PPG, 14 RPG, 70% TS), purely so the shape stays readable at a glance. The real number is always printed at every point.
Performance by Opponent Strength?
2025-26 season, 32 games logged.
| Split | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TOPG | MPG | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs. High-Major (HM) | 1 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 24.0 | 42.9% |
| vs. Mid-Major (MM) | 4 | 12.2 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 32.2 | 44.2% |
| vs. Low-Major (LM) | 23 | 10.2 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 29.6 | 36.5% |
| vs. Top 50 nationally | 1 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 24.0 | 42.9% |
| Last 10 games | 10 | 11.7 | 6.5 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 32.4 | 37.6% |
Games against any of the 50 highest-rated teams in the country this season (by current_rating), regardless of tier -- not a top-50-per-tier cut.
Best 3 Games
Ranked by points + rebounds + assists combined, 2025-26 season -- real box scores, no projection involved.
| Date | Opponent | Min | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3PT | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 | OhioLM | 35 | 17 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-12 | 2-4 | 5-8 |
| Feb 26 | Cleveland StateLM | 34 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10-16 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Feb 19 | MilwaukeeLM | 29 | 14 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6-13 | 0-2 | 2-3 |
Game-by-Game Production Rating?
2025-26 season, one bar per game -- points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks added up, turnovers subtracted, so a quiet scoring night that was still a big all-around game (or a big scoring night undone by turnovers) still shows up as a strong or weak game here. Bars that dip below the line are games with a negative production rating (more turnovers than total production).