Benthe Versteeg
2025-26 season
Real season production first, then how it splits against tougher/weaker opponents and how it's trended over time. Want to see what she'd project to at a different school? Use the button below to send her straight into Transfer Projection.
Per-Game Production
Top 50.06% nationally by Summit Score, among 2025-26 Division I players on record.
Season by season
Trend: Declining (-3.3 Summit Score/season) · Heuristic based on average Hoop Score change per season on record (>= +3.0 Improving, <= -3.0 Declining, else Stable) -- not a fitted statistical trend.
| Season | Team | GP | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TS% | Summit Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Sacramento State | 31 | 38.4 | 11.6 | 3.6 | 6.7 | 41.4 | 66.8 | ||
| 2024-25 | Sacramento State | 32 | 34.9 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 47.1 | 74.0 | ||
| 2025-26 | Sacramento State | 33 | 34.4 | 11.9 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 44.4 | 60.3 | ||
Key Stats?
Not a percentile and not a comparison against the rest of the league -- each axis is capped at a fixed, realistic ceiling for a women's college season (e.g. 28 PPG, 14 RPG, 70% TS), purely so the shape stays readable at a glance. The real number is always printed at every point.
Performance by Opponent Strength?
2025-26 season, 33 games logged.
| Split | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TOPG | MPG | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs. High-Major (HM) | 1 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 34.0 | 38.5% |
| vs. Mid-Major (MM) | 4 | 11.5 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 5.2 | 37.5 | 34.7% |
| vs. Low-Major (LM) | 26 | 12.6 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 5.2 | 34.8 | 38.3% |
| vs. Top 50 nationally | 1 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 34.0 | 38.5% |
| Last 10 games | 10 | 14.0 | 5.2 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 5.1 | 35.5 | 41.5% |
Games against any of the 50 highest-rated teams in the country this season (by current_rating), regardless of tier -- not a top-50-per-tier cut.
Best 3 Games
Ranked by points + rebounds + assists combined, 2025-26 season -- real box scores, no projection involved.
| Date | Opponent | Min | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3PT | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27 | MontanaLM | 39 | 21 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 10-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Jan 3 | Weber State WildcatsLM | 36 | 18 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 7-16 | 1-4 | 3-4 |
| Jan 23 | IdahoLM | 31 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9-22 | 4-11 | 4-4 |
Game-by-Game Production Rating?
2025-26 season, one bar per game -- points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks added up, turnovers subtracted, so a quiet scoring night that was still a big all-around game (or a big scoring night undone by turnovers) still shows up as a strong or weak game here. Bars that dip below the line are games with a negative production rating (more turnovers than total production).