Mackenzie Chatfield

2025-26 season

Real season production first, then how it splits against tougher/weaker opponents and how it's trended over time. Want to see what she'd project to at a different school? Use the button below to send her straight into Transfer Projection.

Mackenzie Chatfield
JR · G · 5' 9" · Washington State
62.8
Summit Score

Per-Game Production

34
GP
31
GS
25.1
MPG
4.6
PPG
3.5
RPG
3.3
APG
1.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
1.9
TOPG
45.7
TS%
39.1
FG%
0.0
3FG%
88.1
FT%
62.8
Summit Score

Top 45.14% nationally by Summit Score, among 2025-26 Division I players on record.

Season by season 1 transfer on record

Trend: Improving (+10.3 Summit Score/season) · Heuristic based on average Hoop Score change per season on record (>= +3.0 Improving, <= -3.0 Declining, else Stable) -- not a fitted statistical trend.

2023-24: 42.3 Summit Score (Western Kentucky)42.32023-242024-25: 57.5 Summit Score (Western Kentucky)57.52024-252025-26: 62.8 Summit Score (Washington State)62.82025-26
SeasonTeamGPMPGPPGRPGAPGTS%Summit Score
2023-24Western Kentucky206.10.90.30.545.542.3
2024-25Western Kentucky3119.95.81.32.453.657.5
2025-26Washington Statetransferred in3425.14.63.53.345.762.8

Key Stats?

Not a percentile and not a comparison against the rest of the league -- each axis is capped at a fixed, realistic ceiling for a women's college season (e.g. 28 PPG, 14 RPG, 70% TS), purely so the shape stays readable at a glance. The real number is always printed at every point.

PPG: 4.6PPG4.6RPG: 3.5RPG3.5APG: 3.3APG3.3SPG: 1.0SPG1.0BPG: 0.0BPG0.0TOPG: 1.9TOPG1.9TS%: 45.7TS%45.7

Performance by Opponent Strength?

2025-26 season, 34 games logged.

SplitGPPPGRPGAPGSPGBPGTOPGMPGFG%
vs. High-Major (HM)61.74.22.21.00.02.224.329.4%
vs. Mid-Major (MM)235.73.73.71.10.01.826.242.1%
vs. Low-Major (LM)52.82.22.60.60.02.020.823.1%
vs. Top 50 nationally41.53.22.21.20.02.225.830.0%
Last 10 games108.13.94.41.90.02.130.944.1%

Games against any of the 50 highest-rated teams in the country this season (by current_rating), regardless of tier -- not a top-50-per-tier cut.

Best 3 Games

Ranked by points + rebounds + assists combined, 2025-26 season -- real box scores, no projection involved.

DateOpponentMinPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOFG3PTFT
Feb 6San DiegoMM3316731016-90-04-4
Feb 27SeattleMM306773013-80-00-0
Feb 7PepperdineMM319384043-100-03-3

Game-by-Game Production Rating?

2025-26 season, one bar per game -- points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks added up, turnovers subtracted, so a quiet scoring night that was still a big all-around game (or a big scoring night undone by turnovers) still shows up as a strong or weak game here. Bars that dip below the line are games with a negative production rating (more turnovers than total production).

Nov 3 vs Idaho: 9 production rating (5 pts, 3 reb, 4 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)Nov 6 vs UNLV: 6 production rating (0 pts, 3 reb, 1 ast, 1 stl, 1 blk, 0 TO)Nov 8 vs Southern Utah: 9 production rating (3 pts, 3 reb, 3 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Nov 15 vs Stanford: 11 production rating (2 pts, 6 reb, 1 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 0 TO)Nov 20 vs Oregon: 13 production rating (4 pts, 3 reb, 6 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Nov 23 vs Missouri: 5 production rating (2 pts, 4 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Nov 28 vs Miami (OH): 6 production rating (6 pts, 2 reb, 1 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)Nov 30 vs LSU: 1 production rating (0 pts, 2 reb, 2 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)Dec 3 vs BYU: 12 production rating (2 pts, 8 reb, 4 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)Dec 11 vs Eastern Washington: 5 production rating (0 pts, 3 reb, 4 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Dec 13 vs Texas Tech: -1 production rating (0 pts, 2 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)Dec 17 vs Seton Hall: -1 production rating (0 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Dec 19 vs Pennsylvania: 2 production rating (0 pts, 0 reb, 1 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 0 TO)Dec 28 vs Pepperdine: 17 production rating (9 pts, 4 reb, 5 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Dec 31 vs Loyola Marymount: 6 production rating (2 pts, 2 reb, 2 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 0 TO)Jan 3 vs Portland: 4 production rating (2 pts, 4 reb, 3 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 6 TO)Jan 4 vs Seattle: 6 production rating (0 pts, 3 reb, 3 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Jan 9 vs Oregon State: 15 production rating (4 pts, 8 reb, 4 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Jan 10 vs Santa Clara: 8 production rating (2 pts, 3 reb, 6 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)Jan 16 vs Saint Mary's: 17 production rating (8 pts, 5 reb, 4 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Jan 18 vs San Francisco: 9 production rating (2 pts, 2 reb, 5 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 0 TO)Jan 23 vs Pacific: 1 production rating (0 pts, 3 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Jan 30 vs Santa Clara: 18 production rating (11 pts, 4 reb, 3 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Feb 1 vs Gonzaga: 17 production rating (10 pts, 3 reb, 6 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Feb 6 vs San Diego: 26 production rating (16 pts, 7 reb, 3 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Feb 7 vs Pepperdine: 20 production rating (9 pts, 3 reb, 8 ast, 4 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)Feb 13 vs Portland: 8 production rating (4 pts, 3 reb, 3 ast, 2 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)Feb 20 vs Gonzaga: 12 production rating (6 pts, 3 reb, 4 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 2 TO)Feb 21 vs Oregon State: 18 production rating (12 pts, 3 reb, 2 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 0 TO)Feb 27 vs Seattle: 22 production rating (6 pts, 7 reb, 7 ast, 3 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Feb 28 vs Saint Mary's: 17 production rating (6 pts, 5 reb, 4 ast, 3 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Mar 5 vs Seattle: 19 production rating (8 pts, 4 reb, 5 ast, 3 stl, 0 blk, 1 TO)Mar 6 vs Pacific: 16 production rating (12 pts, 2 reb, 5 ast, 1 stl, 0 blk, 4 TO)Mar 7 vs Portland: 4 production rating (2 pts, 2 reb, 3 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, 3 TO)