Wyvette Mayberry
2025-26 season
Real season production first, then how it splits against tougher/weaker opponents and how it's trended over time. Want to see what she'd project to at a different school? Use the button below to send her straight into Transfer Projection.
Per-Game Production
Top 42.4% nationally by Summit Score, among 2025-26 Division I players on record.
Season by season 1 transfer on record
Trend: Declining (-4.7 Summit Score/season) · Heuristic based on average Hoop Score change per season on record (>= +3.0 Improving, <= -3.0 Declining, else Stable) -- not a fitted statistical trend.
| Season | Team | GP | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TS% | Summit Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Kansas | 32 | 31.1 | 9.7 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 48.5 | 73.5 | ||
| 2024-25 | Kansas | 6 | 17.3 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 34.5 | 49.2 | ||
| 2025-26 | Arkansastransferred in | 28 | 22.3 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 47.3 | 64.2 | ||
Key Stats?
Not a percentile and not a comparison against the rest of the league -- each axis is capped at a fixed, realistic ceiling for a women's college season (e.g. 28 PPG, 14 RPG, 70% TS), purely so the shape stays readable at a glance. The real number is always printed at every point.
Performance by Opponent Strength?
2025-26 season, 28 games logged.
| Split | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TOPG | MPG | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs. High-Major (HM) | 19 | 6.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 21.3 | 30.9% |
| vs. Mid-Major (MM) | 2 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 21.5 | 45.5% |
| vs. Low-Major (LM) | 7 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 25.3 | 34.0% |
| vs. Top 50 nationally | 14 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 19.3 | 22.5% |
| Last 10 games | 10 | 7.6 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 20.7 | 35.9% |
Games against any of the 50 highest-rated teams in the country this season (by current_rating), regardless of tier -- not a top-50-per-tier cut.
Best 3 Games
Ranked by points + rebounds + assists combined, 2025-26 season -- real box scores, no projection involved.
| Date | Opponent | Min | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3PT | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1 | Auburn TigersHM | 36 | 25 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7-12 | 6-8 | 5-6 |
| Feb 6 | Missouri TigersHM | 33 | 19 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7-13 | 5-10 | 0-0 |
| Dec 5 | SMU MustangsHM | 35 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-9 | 1-4 | 5-6 |
Game-by-Game Production Rating?
2025-26 season, one bar per game -- points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks added up, turnovers subtracted, so a quiet scoring night that was still a big all-around game (or a big scoring night undone by turnovers) still shows up as a strong or weak game here. Bars that dip below the line are games with a negative production rating (more turnovers than total production).